Species · Zeolites

Stellerite

Stellerite is a calcium zeolite, density 2.13 and perfect {010} cleavage, in radiating spheres to 12 cm. Its Handbook sheet records no hardness figure at all.

Formula CaAl2Si7O18 7H2OIMA formula Ca4(Si28Al8)O72 28H2O, approved 1997Hardness Not determined on the Handbook sheetDensity 2.13 measured, 2.12 calculatedCleavage Perfect on {010}Habit and lustre Radiating spheres of crystals to 12 cm; vitreous lustreAssociates Zeolites, prehnite, tridymiteType material Natural History Museum, London, 1934,650

Stellerite is a calcium zeolite, orthorhombic, with perfect {010} cleavage and a measured density of 2.13, forming radiating spheres of colourless to white crystals to 12 cm in altered volcanic rocks. Its Handbook of Mineralogy sheet is one of only four in this site's 158-sheet reference set that records no hardness at all, and its X-ray pattern cannot be distinguished from barrerite.

In short

  • Four of 158 sheets in this site's reference set give no hardness figure: stellerite, barrerite, freibergite and cyanotrichite. Stellerite's physical-properties line reads Hardness = n.d. The property most collectors reach for first has simply never been determined on this species.
  • Two of those three are the same pair the Handbook says cannot be told apart by X-ray. Stellerite's sheet states its powder pattern cannot be distinguished from barrerite, and barrerite's sheet says the same of stellerite. Both record a measured density of 2.13(1). Two species, no hardness, indistinguishable patterns, identical densities.
  • What does separate them is chemistry, and only chemistry. Stellerite is the calcium member and barrerite the sodium-dominant one. Nothing a collector can do at a bench distinguishes them; this is a microprobe determination or an unlabelled specimen.
  • Density does separate it from stilbite and heulandite, but barely. Stellerite 2.13, heulandite 2.10 to 2.20, stilbite-Ca 2.19. The whole zeolite group sits within a tenth of a unit, which is why locality and habit carry the identification in practice.
  • It is named for a man who died in Siberia in 1746. Georg Wilhelm Steller was the naturalist on Bering's second expedition and the discoverer of the Komandorskiye Islands, where the species was first found. The type material is in the Natural History Museum in London.
Stellerite against the zeolites it is filed beside
SpeciesSystemHardnessDensityWhat separates it
StelleriteOrthorhombicNot determined2.13Radiating spheres to 12 cm; calcium-dominant
BarreriteOrthorhombicNot determined2.13Sodium-dominant. Nothing else; the powder patterns are indistinguishable
Stilbite-CaMonoclinic3.5 to 42.19The classic sheaf and bowtie habit, and a hardness that has actually been measured
HeulanditeMonoclinic3.5 to 42.10 to 2.20Coffin-shaped tabular crystals on a pearly {010} cleavage
ScoleciteMonoclinic5 to 5.52.25 to 2.29Far harder; fine acicular sprays, and it fuses with curling
MesoliteMonoclinic52.26Hair-fine needles in dense tufts; harder again

What n.d. means, and why it is not laziness

The Handbook of Mineralogy prints n.d. — not determined — where a measurement does not exist in the literature. It is a statement about the published record, not about the mineral.

Across the 158 species sheets in this site's reference set, only four carry it in the hardness position: stellerite, barrerite, cyanotrichite and freibergite. Two of the four are zeolites, and the reason is structural. Stellerite grows as radiating spheres of thin crystals that part on a perfect {010} cleavage; there is very little material in a stellerite specimen that can hold a scratch test still. A Mohs determination needs a crystal face big enough and rigid enough to resist a point, and the habit does not supply one.

Freibergite's sheet goes further and records D(meas.) = n.d. as well, so it is the only sheet in the set with neither a hardness nor a measured density. Comparable zeolites do have figures — stilbite-Ca 3.5 to 4, heulandite 3.5 to 4, scolecite 5 to 5.5 — and the sensible working assumption for stellerite is the stilbite range. An assumption is what it is, and this page will not print it as a fact.

The pair the reference literature cannot separate

This is the part worth knowing before buying one.

Stellerite's X-ray powder pattern entry, taken from Villanova Monteleone in Sardinia, ends with the words cannot be distinguished from barrerite. Barrerite's entry, taken from Capo Pula in the same island, ends with the words cannot be distinguished from stellerite. The strongest lines are 9.03 and 9.10, 4.057 and 4.054, 3.028 and 3.028.

Both record a measured density of 2.13(1) — the same figure to the same stated uncertainty. Both record no hardness. Both are orthorhombic, colourless to white, with perfect {010} cleavage. The single property that separates them is which alkali or alkaline-earth cation dominates the channels, calcium in stellerite and sodium in barrerite, and that is a chemical analysis.

The practical consequence: a stellerite specimen without a locality or an analysis is not verifiable, in a stricter sense than usual. The general argument is on whether a specimen without a locality is worth buying, and this species is the sharpest case of it on the site.

Localities, and the Indian material most collectors actually see

The Handbook opens its distribution entry by saying stellerite is increasingly recognised from localities worldwide and that only the best confirmed can be listed — itself a consequence of the identification problem above.

The type occurrence is Copper Island in the Komandorskiye Islands in the Bering Sea, with Klichka in the Chita region of Siberia. Then the Sarbayskaya quarry near Rudniy in Kazakhstan; Villanova Monteleone in Sardinia; Kongsberg in Norway; Ritter Hot Springs in Oregon, Hook Mountain in New York and Fanwood in New Jersey; large crystals from around Gunnedah in New South Wales and from Harcourt, Dookie and Corop in Victoria; and exceptional examples from Cinchwad near Poona and the Nasik district in Maharashtra, India.

The Deccan basalt quarries of Maharashtra are where almost all zeolite specimens in circulation come from, and the same pits produce the heulandite, stilbite, scolecite and apophyllite this site already covers. The Handbook's occurrence line for stellerite — lining cavities and fracture surfaces in volcanic rocks altered by hydrothermal solutions, with zeolites, prehnite and tridymite — describes those quarries exactly.

The type material is held at the Natural History Museum in London under 1934,650. The rest of this reference section is indexed at the species index, and the only commercial route here is the wanted list; there is no catalogue and nothing on this site is offered for sale.

Questions

How hard is stellerite?
There is no published figure. The Handbook of Mineralogy prints Hardness = n.d. for it, one of only four such entries in this site's 158-sheet reference set. Comparable zeolites run 3.5 to 4, so treat it as a soft mineral and do not test it on a specimen you care about.
How do I tell stellerite from stilbite?
Habit first. Stellerite forms radiating spheres of crystals to 12 cm; stilbite-Ca forms the sheaf and bowtie aggregates it is famous for. Densities are 2.13 against 2.19, which is too close for a home measurement to settle. Locality helps: much Indian material sold as stilbite has turned out to be stellerite on analysis.
Do zeolites lose water on the shelf?
Several do, and it changes them permanently. Zeolite channel water is weakly held, and dry heat or very low humidity can drive it off, clouding a transparent crystal. The NatSCA guidance on the care and conservation of geological specimens recommends a stable 45 to 60% relative humidity for mineral collections, and our note on how to store soluble mineral specimens covers the species most at risk.
Who was Steller?
Georg Wilhelm Steller, 1709 to 1746, the German naturalist on Vitus Bering's second Kamchatka expedition and the discoverer of the Komandorskiye Islands, where the species was first found. Steller's jay, Steller's sea cow and Steller's sea eagle are named for the same man.
Is stellerite worth collecting?
As a zeolite suite species, yes, and the Indian and Australian material is genuinely handsome. As a single specimen it carries the identification caveat above: without an analysis or a trustworthy locality, a white radiating zeolite sphere is a probability rather than a determination. Buy the label as much as the crystal.